The
thing is, “thing” once referred to a judicial assembly
by
Howard Richler
Last
month we looked at some words that centuries ago were born in the
field of law and
eventually
developed a more general sense. This month we will look at some
other terms whose legal roots might surprise you.
Mayhem
While
engaging in mayhem will sometimes land one in front of a court of
law, we probably associate the word more with a hockey match than a
trial. However, the OED
informs us that mayhem has proper legal bona fides: “Criminal
Law. The
infliction of physical injury on a person, so as to impair or destroy
that person's capacity for self-defence; an instance of this.” The
word's first citation is found in the
Rolls of Parliament
(1447): “Where apon growith ofte times‥Roberies, Murthers,
mayehemes, and manslauter.” Its first usage to refer to violent
behaviour and particularly physical assault is found in Mark Twain's
Territorial
Enterprise (1870):
“This same man‥pantingly threatened me with permanent disfiguring
mayhem, if ever again I should introduce his name into print.”
Ordeal
This
word in Old English had a specific legal meaning.
It
referred to a
trial
in which an accused person was subjected to a test, usually involving
physical pain or danger. If you overcame these crucibles it was
regarded as divine proof of your innocence. These tests were ordeals
by fire, (e.g., carrying heated metal) hot water, (plunging your
hands into boiling water) cold water, and combat. It wouldn't be
until 1215 that these legal methods were abolished. As in modern-day
reality television, these ordeals were somewhat rigged. To be
declared innocent one would have to accomplish the impossible, such
as carrying red-hot coals without being burned. It was only in the
17th
century that ordeal acquired its metaphorical and less painful
meaning of a “trying experience.” For example,
John Cleveland wrote in The
Works of John Cleveland
(1687),“The Ordale of the Sword justified Caesar and condemned
Pompey not his Cause.”
Paraphernalia
This
long word was one of the favourites of former great hockey announcer
Danny Gallivan, but I doubt that even erudite Gallivan knew the
word's original sense: “Articles of personal property, especially
clothing and ornaments, which (exceptionally at common law) did not
automatically transfer from the property of the wife to the husband
by virtue of the marriage.” The other segment of her property, her
dowry was transferred to her spouse. In his novel The
Eustace Diamonds, (
1871) Anthony Trollope uses the word in a legal sense when the
heroine accepts a diamond necklace as a wedding gift from her
husband and later tries to keep it as part of her paraphernalia,
i.e., “bride's goods.”
In the
18th
century the sense was extended to refer to various belongings or
accessories, such as what hockey sticks and goalie pads. In the 20th
century, the word was often modified by the word drug to refer to the
equipment that drug users require.
Engross
The
OED tells us that
in the 14th
century engross meant “to write in a peculiar character
appropriate to legal documents,” i.e. large lettering. In the 15th
century the word meant to buy “in gross,” i.e., “to buy up
wholesale; especially
to buy up the
whole stock, or as much as possible, of (a commodity) for the purpose
of .. retailing it at a monopoly price.” (A grocer originally was
a dealer in gross). At the end of the 16th
century, engross came into its modern sense of absorbing totally.
Thing
This
king of non-specific word is one of the oldest ones in our language
but originally it enjoyed a rather specific meaning a a meeting or an
assembly and specifically a judicial assembly. (This judicial sense
is seen in the name of the Norwegian Parliament, Storting
that
means “great thing”). From there it came to refer to a cause
brought before such an assembly and soon thereafter to any cause in
general. From here it was only a small step for the word to refer to
any matter to which one is concerned and later to any deed,
circumstance or phenomenon. Its sense, however, to refer to an
activity that attracts a particular group, e,g., “'its a guy thing”
is fairly modern and the OED's
first citation of such only goes back to Nov 9,1967 in the New
York Times:
“Few whites are travelling to Harlem for entertainment. It's a
black thing now.”
The
use of thing in a sexual context has deep historical roots. In
Canterbury
Tales,
the Wife of Bath opines “Our bothe thynges smale/Were eek to knowe
a female from a male.” Shakespeare used the word thing often in a
bawdy sense even in some seemingly innocuous places. For example when
Rosalind uses the phrase “too much of a good thing” in As
You Like It,
“thing” was also being used as a euphemism for genitalia as it
had been in Chaucer's era.
This
article is adapted from Howard Richler's recently released How
Happy Became Homosexual and other mysterious semantic shifts
published by
Ronsdale Press. It
is available both as a print and as an ebook.
No comments:
Post a Comment